BDD Addict Newsletter October 2020 (#49)

Sketch of the Cynefin framework, by Edwin Stoop (Source: Wikipedia)

[BDD] Don’t let your scenarios block the conversation!

I have stumbled across a post by Justin Rohrman about BDD from 2018 that I would like to share. He shares an honest report about the benefits and challenges of the BDD process they have introduced. I don’t remember how loud the BDD community was in 2018 about emphasizing that conversations are an important part of BDD, but Justin got to the same conclusion. Furthermore, he also realized that having a real conversation about the requirements is difficult if you also need to focus on the Gherkin syntax at the same time. By today Example Mapping and similar techniques have become more popular, but it is still interesting to read about the details of BDD being used in a concrete project.

BDD in Action: Dissecting the Conversation (Justin Rohrman, @JustinRohrman)

Picture from Justin Rohrman’s post

[BDD] BDD helps to better understand agile

We had already adopted many agile practices by the time I started using BDD. We had user stories, grooming meetings, automated tests and CI pipeline, but I understood the real benefits of some of these only when we started to use them as a part of our BDD process. BDD is not an isolated, stand-alone technique, but connects and includes many other agile techniques and principles. In this post I collected the 6 most important ones for me.

6 things that will make your adoption of BDD easier (Gaspar Nagy, @gasparnagy)

Photo by Irfan Simsar on Unsplash.com

BDD with SpecFlow course for developers and testers
with Gáspár Nagy

1–3 February 2021, INSTRUCTOR-LED ONLINE COURSE

[BDD] Don’t miss the important aspects of the requirements

Our industry has been practicing writing “proper specification” for decades now. Still, we are not really good at it. Or at least I haven’t found any that proved to be perfect. Often the problem is that the ones writing the specs see the problem only from a certain point of view and therefore they miss some aspects that are in the shade of their initial thought. Examples enable the team to collaborate on the requirement and significantly reduce the amount of forgotten details. A post by Seb Rose.

Better requirements by harnessing the power of examples (Seb Rose, @sebrose)

Picture from the original post

[Process] Do reviews right!

Many teams work remote nowadays. Giving feedback about each-other’s work is harder and by using more formal channels like email or GitHub there is a bigger chance that the feedback becomes or received as personal. Some folks at Google created a quick summary of useful review techniques. It even comes with a printer-friendly version to display in your office wherever you work from nowadays.

Code Health: Respectful Reviews == Useful Reviews (Liz Kammer, Maggie Hodges, Ambar Murillo from @googletesting)

Photo by David Watkis on Unsplash.com

Use SpecSync from Windows, Mac and Linux. Now also available as a Docker.

https://www.specsolutions.eu/services/specsync/

[Automation] Testing async services with Cucumber

I have chosen the article by Moisés Macero as the last one for this month; he is the author of the Apress book Learn Microservices with Spring Boot. This article is actually the fourth part of a series but can also be read without reading the others. The article focuses on how to test asynchronous services and eventual consistency, but it is also a good showcase of how the actor model can be used with Cucumber.

Using Awaitility with Cucumber for Eventual Consistency checks (Moisés Macero, @moises_macero)

Figure from the original post

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store